Urb Buzz - Reader Response

Thank you my upside down friend for your commentary about the Lindsey Lohan (Lilo) to this post -> http://urbanomics.blogspot.com/2007/07/urb-buzz-july-07.html. I love to debate so here we go:

First you say Lilo is not risky or unreliable. Wrong, she is risky because the cops found COKE on her and all she could say was that she borrowed someone's jeans and that's why drugs were found. Remind me to accidently borrow your jeans when you win the lottery. Unreliable, again she get the top prize because a movie has been put on hold because guess what...Lilo is a train wreck. So yes, before I jump ship I asked myself the same two questions you posed:

1. Does the person still make money - Investors evaluate the time value of money. Roll with me homey...the possibility Lilo will continue to make top dollar in the future is shrinking rapidly.

2. Will her actions affect future profits - Yes, when movie investors - big banks that fund movies, insurance companies that fund movies, and movie goers realize that Lilo is a train wreck the money stops flowing. And supposedly some of the insurance companies are pulling the plug...I know I would.

Finally, I do agree with you and most actors get a second, third and fourth chance...but like stock market crashes people do not quickly forget when they've been burned. And no CEO's drunk driving will not cause a stock to dive, but remember these incidents:

1. Martha Stewart - stock tanks
2. Rigas Family scandal - Adelphia telecommunication company split in pieces and sold
Honorable Mention - World Wrestling Entertainment, traded a little lower when people actually thought Vince McMahon died in one of WWE crazy televised stunts

Notice, big investors are pulling the plug on Michael Vick, Rawlings just canned him, Nike and Reekbok put his products on hold...and he hasn't even been indicted. Why, because the RISK is just to HIGH

get ur URB on